Skip to content
CompetiLab

Academic Writing

How a high school student writes a research paper and gets it published

Academic writing is not a format. It is a sequence of steps anyone can learn. This guide walks from the research question, literature, method, IMRaD structure and citation to choosing a journal, submitting and answering reviewers, for students writing their first paper and the parents supporting them.

Author
CompetiLab Editorial
Published
Reading time
5 min read
Abstract composition of ruled manuscript lines with sage highlights, standing in for an annotated research draft.
Placeholder image

A high school student can write a real research paper and submit it for publication. The path has eight steps: ask a question you can answer, read the literature to confirm it is worth asking, write down your method and how you will judge it, gather and record evidence, draft in the IMRaD structure, get the citations right, choose a venue at the right level, then submit and respond to reviewers. Every step can be learned. The first and the last are where most students get stuck.

This guide explains what each step involves, what it produces and the mistakes that are easy to make. It is written by CompetiLab, an independent studio in Taipei that mentors secondary school students through research and academic writing.

The eight steps

  1. 01

    Ask a question you can answer

    Too big and it never ends; too small and it is not worth doing. A good research question can be answered with the time, data and tools you have, and someone will care about the answer whichever way it comes out. See how to write a research question you can actually answer.
  2. 02

    Read the literature to confirm the question is open

    Find out what has been done, with which methods, and where the gaps are. You do not need to read every paper end to end; triage first with reading a paper in three passes.
  3. 03

    Write down the method and how you will judge it

    Decide what you will compare, how you will measure it and which results would support or refute your hypothesis. Writing it first stops you from moving the goalposts after you see the data.
  4. 04

    Gather evidence and record everything

    Experiments, surveys, public datasets and machine learning experiments can all be evidence. Record every attempt well enough that someone else could repeat it, including the ones that failed.
  5. 05

    Draft in the IMRaD structure

    Most scientific papers are built from an introduction, methods, results and discussion. The next section explains what each part must answer.
  6. 06

    Get the citations right

    Citation is not a set of punctuation rules; it is how a paper shows its reasoning. Every claim you did not discover yourself points to its source. See citation is an argument, not a formality.
  7. 07

    Choose a venue at the right level

    Student research journals, general academic journals, and conferences or workshops hold work to different standards. Match the paper to its level; see where a secondary school student can publish research.
  8. 08

    Submit, go through review, revise

    Format the manuscript to the journal's author guidelines, submit, wait for the editor's check and peer review, then revise and answer each reviewer comment point by point.

The structure of a paper: IMRaD

IMRaD stands for Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion, the most common skeleton of an empirical research paper. Each part answers one question a reader has:

PartThe question it answersA common mistake
IntroductionWhy does this matter? What is known and missing?Too much background; the question arrives late
MethodsWhat did you do? Could someone repeat it?Missing data sources, settings or exclusions
ResultsWhat did you find?Explaining or defending inside the results
DiscussionWhat does it mean? What are the limits?Treating correlation as cause, or hiding limits

A title and abstract come before, and references after. The abstract states the question, method, main result and why it matters; word limits commonly fall between 150 and 300 words, and the journal's own rule is the one that counts.

A practical order of writing: methods and results first, because they only record what you did; then the discussion; and the introduction, abstract and title last, because only then do you know what the paper says.

English or your first language?

Most international journals and conferences publish in English, so papers aimed at them are usually written in English. That does not mean thinking in English from the start. Working out the argument and the outline in the language you think best in, then writing it in English, often produces a clearer paper. English carries the argument; the argument is the paper.

Can you use AI tools?

Yes, honestly. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) holds that AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot take responsibility for the work, that authors who use AI for writing, images or data should say which tool they used and how, and that human authors remain responsible for all of the content (COPE: Authorship and AI tools). Journals' policies differ, so read the one you are submitting to.

Our rule: AI can find typos, check code and argue with a paragraph, but the question, the judgments and the conclusions are the student's, and every use is disclosed.

What happens after you submit

  1. The editor's check. The editor checks scope and format and returns manuscripts that do not fit.
  2. Peer review. Manuscripts that pass go to reviewers, who judge whether the method, evidence and conclusions hold.
  3. A decision. Typical outcomes are accept, minor revision, major revision or reject. Acceptance on first submission is rare; being asked to revise is normal.
  4. Revision and response. Answer every comment: revise where you agree, and explain politely where you do not.
  5. Publication. After acceptance come typesetting and proofs, then the paper appears.

A rejection does not mean the research has no value. Reading the reviews, improving the paper and submitting to the next suitable venue is ordinary research life.

Three common questions

Can a high school student really publish a paper? Yes. Some journals exist to publish secondary school research, and work that makes a real contribution can be accepted by general journals or conference workshops. Acceptance is always the reviewers' decision.

Do you need a lab? No. Analysis of public datasets, machine learning experiments, survey research and systematic literature reviews are all legitimate methods. What matters is a clear question and a careful method.

How do you avoid predatory journals? Guaranteed acceptance, implausibly fast review and vague fees are warning signs. Before submitting, use the checklist at Think. Check. Submit. and see whether the journal is listed in a directory such as the DOAJ.

All articles

Begin

Begin with a question.

Tell us what a student cannot stop thinking about. We will suggest where it could go.